Whiplash Risk factors

Study #1:

Rydman E, Kasina P, Ponzer S, Järnbert-Pettersson H. Association between cervical degeneration and self-perceived nonrecovery after whiplash injury. Spine J. 2019 Dec;19(12):1986-94. PubMed PMID: 31394280. Epub 2019/08/09. eng.

“BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Pre-existing radiological degenerative changes have not previously been considered a risk factor for nonrecovery from neck pain due to motor vehicle accidents (MVA). Results from previous studies are however often based on assessment of plain radiography or MRI and little consideration has been given to facet joints. Furthermore, previous studies have often lacked a validated scoring system for degenerative changes. PURPOSE: To investigate the association between cervical degeneration on computed tomography (CT) and nonrecovery after whiplash trauma. STUDY DESIGN: Longitudinal cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: One hundred twenty-one patients attending the Emergency Department because of neck pain after MVA, 2015-2017, with a valid CT-scan of the cervical spine and completion of follow up after 6 months. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was self-perceived nonrecovery (yes/no) after 6 months. A secondary outcome measure was self-reported pain level (Numeric Rating Scale). METHODS: Baseline data regarding demographics and health factors were gathered through a web-based questionnaire. Degeneration of facet joints and intervertebral discs was assessed on CT-scans according to a validated scoring system. Binary logistic regression was used to study the association between cervical degeneration and nonrecovery. RESULTS: Moderate facet joint degeneration was associated with nonrecovery. In the group with moderate degree of facet joint degeneration, 69.6% reported nonrecovery compared with 23.6% among patients without any signs of degeneration (adjusted odds ratio 6.7 [95% confidence interval: 1.9-24.3]). There was no association between disc degeneration and nonrecovery. Combined facet joint degeneration and disc degeneration were associated with nonrecovery (adjusted odds ratio 6.2 [2.0-19.0]). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that cervical degeneration, especially facet joint degeneration, is a risk factor for nonrecovery after whiplash trauma. We hypothesize that whiplash trauma can be a trigger for painful manifestation of previously asymptomatic facet joint degeneration.”

Study #2:

Lau G, Gabbe BJ, Collie A, Ponsford J, Ameratunga S, Cameron PA, et al. The Association Between Fault Attribution and Work Participation After Road Traffic Injury: A Registry-Based Observational Study. Journal of occupational rehabilitation. 2020 Jun;30(2):235-54.

“Purpose To characterise associations between fault attribution and work participation and capacity after road traffic injury. Methods People aged 15-65 years, working pre-injury, without serious brain injury, who survived to 12 months after road traffic injury were included from two Victorian trauma registries (n = 2942). Fault profiles from linked compensation claims were defined as no other at fault, another at fault, denied another at fault, claimed another at fault, and unknown. Claimant reports in the denied and claimed another at fault groups contradicted police reports. Patients reported work capacity (Glasgow outcome scale-extended) and return to work (RTW) at 6, 12 and 24 months post-injury (early and sustained RTW, delayed RTW (>/= 12 months), failed RTW attempts, no RTW attempts). Analyses adjusted for demographic, clinical and injury covariates. Results The risk of not returning to work was higher if another was at fault [adjusted relative risk ratio (aRRR) = 1.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.29, 2.17] or was claimed to be at fault (aRRR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.04, 2.41), and lower for those who denied that another was at fault (aRRR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.29, 0.91), compared to cases with no other at fault. Similarly, people had higher odds of work capacity limitations if another was at fault (12m: AOR = 1.49, 95% CI 1.24, 1.80; 24m: 1.63, 95% CI 1.35, 1.97) or was claimed to be at fault (12m: AOR = 1.54, 95% CI 1.16, 2.05; 24m: AOR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.34, 2.41), and lower odds if they denied another was at fault (6m: AOR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.48, 0.95), compared to cases with no other at fault. Conclusion Targeted interventions are needed to support work participation in people at risk of poor RTW post-injury. While interventions targeting fault and justice-related attributions are currently lacking, these may be beneficial for people who believe that another caused their injury.”